I’m a liberal now.

Forget the fact that my blog has worn the “blogs for bush” button since… um… well at least the last election. I’ve never bothered to take it down. Forget that I voted for Bush not once, but twice, and am a fan of trickle-down economics. Forget that I thought Kerry and Gore were both full of crap, and blogged extensively on why I thought Kerry was in idiot in ’04. Forget that I was brave enough to walk on a college campus in this country with a “Bush Cheney ’04″ sticker stuck boldly to the back of my binder for everyone to see.

Forget all of that.

Because I disagreed with a conservative (several of them) in the comments on another blog, I am a “liberal”. My father, a card-carrying democrat, would heartily disagree and is highly disappointed that his daughter is a “right wing conservative nut-job”.

I’m not here to gripe about the guy that labeled me a liberal. I firmly put him in his place and I am sure he now feels like an idiot, as he should. That’s good enough for me. What I want to discuss, is this growing concern that I have for the dangerous practice of our society to categorize things in groups and apply all aspects of those categories to the people within it, regardless of whether those aspects are true or false.

I guess it is our lot in life, to be slapped with stickers that say that we are this or we are that. We are part of some stereotype that someone else doesn’t like because we disagreed with their ideas. If this is the way life is to be, then I guess I’m a liberal.

Personally, I think stereotypes are born of ignorance. How can you possibly define a human being using a single word? Attempting to do so is to ignore the other facets of the person and choose the one that fits your ideal of them for the time being. It paints a poor picture of who they are, and often is simply dead wrong. If all stereotypes were true, my pillows would be soaked with brylcream and I’d be picking pocket protectors up off the floors because my husband is a nerd. He doesn’t wear pocket protectors, nor does he use brylcream, but the stereotype says he should because of that label, so it must be the truth, right?

So many people have been wrong about me in so many ways, that I have formed a decidedly bad reaction to someone labeling me with any sort of name. I get mad. I think everyone should get mad when they are unfairly labeled. In my view, this is an honest reaction to being shoved into a category by someone who has no idea who you are. The person who gave you that label has taken a look at who you are based on some very skimpy evidence and has chosen your core values for you. The idea of someone passing judgment on you on such shaky ground is simply offensive. It’s only natural that we would get angry about it. This is a very shallow and unfair basis on which to judge a person.

This leads us to the question of what we can do to stop stereotyping. The answer to this is very simple, but it requires you to make a choice. Do the benefits of stereotyping outweigh the consequences? I leave that for you to decide and think about.

  • By Dave Justus, January 19, 2006 @ 3:58 pm

    Hmmmm

    In actuality, K. Pablo never called you a liberal. He asked a question and indicated that an afirmitive reply would demonstrate why he was uncomfortable with entrusting his security to ‘somebody from the left.’ He also disputed your assertion that troop morale was low and said that a far bigger concern to the troops was their treatment by “well-meaning but ignorant liberals.”

    In truth your arguments have sounded pretty much like the ‘liberal talking points.’ I think it understandable that someone would assume that that was your political ideology.

  • By Random Gemini, January 19, 2006 @ 4:35 pm

    Dave… would you mind not commenting on my blog unless you have something to add that involves the actual discussion I have set forth in the post?

    There is a reason that I did not post the name of your blog, or the blog-poster. It is because it was entirely irrelevant to my point, except in that it brought it to my mind.

  • By tsykoduk, January 20, 2006 @ 10:16 am

    I have seen the fall from tolerance towards decisiveness over the past 5 or 10 years, and frankly it scares the heck out of me. You know, I did not vote for Kerry, but I do not feel that he was a ‘bad person’ – he was doing what he thought was best for his political career and hopefully the country as well. An election is not a fight. It’s an attempt to convince people of your point of view. Calling the other side names does nothing to convince. It simply makes the lines that much deeper. It brings the people that agree with you further into your camp, and drives everyone else away.

    I am really looking forward to a candidate that will be tolerant and inclusive. Who will not run a negative campaign. Dunno if it’s going to happen any time soon – I see things getting much worse before they get better.

  • By Random Gemini, January 23, 2006 @ 3:09 pm

    Well said! Certainly stereotyping, and lumping people into those stereotypes is an unfair way of judging their views and does alienate those who balk at being categorized.

    I too hope that we will find a candidate like that in our lifetime, but I don’t really expect that we will see it either. It’s far too easy to fall into the trap of stereotyping and labeling because our society seems very bent on categorizing things that really don’t fit into neat little boxes.

Other Links to this Post

WordPress Themes