Ellen and the Dog.
After reading the comments on this article in wapo, I had to say something.
Many of the commenters in this article are obviously clueless. One particularly irritated me. “Susie” wrote: “And to limit dogs to families with no kids (14 and over is essentially no kids) is ridiculous as well.” I’ve met many a dog that has no business being in a home with children, and many a child that has no business having a dog. There are lots of dogs that love and adore children, a friend of mine has a fat and happy golden retriever that absolutely adores children, and his other dog, a yellow lab/german shepherd mix, while an old lady these days, still manages to get some bounce in her step when she has children to frolick with.
My own dog is another story. He likes his children, but only his children. My dog and my daughter haven’t been famous friends, and my dog has been terrorized by my neighbor’s children in the past, and I only discovered it after I cleaned up cuts and knicks in his skin after a whole fist full of rocks were hucked at him. As a result, my dog doesn’t like children that are more than three feet tall and less than five feet tall. Placing this dog in a home with young children would be sheer idiocy and many dogs that end up in rescue programs end up there because they don’t get along with the children in the home. The rescuers are not doing it to “hoard” the dogs. They’re doing it to save the dogs from an inevitable death in a shelter or on a veterinary table because, for a growing number of dogs out there, dog + children = bite.
It really is down to the fact that so many people just assume that because they have children, they must have a dog. Dogs aren’t part and parcel to the whole parenting schtick, and being a good parent doesn’t mean that you’re a good dog owner. These things are mutually exclusive.
As for Ellen… honey, you should have read your contract. I agree that it is sad that the rescue organization seized the dog from what appears to be a good home, but in the process of trying to get your way you have made it harder for the organization to place other dogs in homes. This isn’t about one dog. This is about a nation of dogs who have been abandoned by their owners for whatever reason. Some of the reasons that I’ve heard for people dropping off their dog at a shelter have shocked me and vary from “Well, I’m moving and he’s too big for an apartment.” to “He didn’t match our living room furniture.” While I understand that your intentions were good, many people are too stupid to own dogs and the rescue organization is just trying to protect the dogs from stupid people. Please try to put your own feelings aside and believe that the rescue really does have the best interests of the dog at heart.
Related posts:
Miss Lucy Girl
Three Months Gone.











By Pamela, October 17, 2007 @ 12:35 pm
The link won’t work for me. Perhaps I should try from home.
I saw part of the broadcast of Ellen crying on TV. I thought something truly tragic had happened, like another school shooting, someone being assassinated or she’d just found out some horrible news. Give me a freaking break. She should have read what she signed. It made me sick to my stomach that she used her show as a platform to try and get what she wants. I understand her intentions were good, but when you adopt an animal from a rescue shelter, 9 times out of 10 they are going to tell you that the contract says you return the dog to them if you cannot keep or care for the dog under any circumstance.
By Random Gemini, October 17, 2007 @ 10:22 pm
It’s actually a policy that’s more typical of breeders and animal rescue organizations, rescue “shelters” don’t tend to have such stringent policies. The rescue shelter I adopted my dog from didn’t have those policies, though they did encourage me to contact them if I was ever in a situation where he would need another home. It was not a part of the contract I signed when I adopted him.
The real big issue here is that Degeneres didn’t read her contract, but at the same time that rescue organization could have been more forthcoming with her about what they had intended to do about her mistake. My understanding of the situation, based on all of the articles I’ve read about this today tells me that they actually deceived her and the family that had taken in the dog by saying they were going to do a home visit and see if the new family met with their approval, but the agent immediately snatched up the dog upon entering the home and took him away without so much as a please or thank you.
Both parties are wrong on this one. Dreadfully so. It’s very sad, but it’s very sad for the dog more than for anyone else.