<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm Pre: iPhone Killer or Dud in the Making?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randomgemini.com/2009/05/palm-pre-iphone-killer-or-dud-in-the-making/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randomgemini.com/2009/05/palm-pre-iphone-killer-or-dud-in-the-making/</link>
	<description>One geeky girl set loose upon the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 05:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShredderFeeder</title>
		<link>http://randomgemini.com/2009/05/palm-pre-iphone-killer-or-dud-in-the-making/comment-page-1/#comment-5912</link>
		<dc:creator>ShredderFeeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randomgemini.com/?p=1211#comment-5912</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the Pre is anything to worry about, Palm lost the battle to RIM some time ago, they&#039;re barely trying to stay relevant.  Palm is the smart-phone of choice among teenie-boppers and such for some reason, but even that&#039;s giving way to Blackberry at this point.

As for Sprint, I have to disagree with you on coverage.  I&#039;ve used sprint for almost 10 years now, and while it started out being because they were the only one to offer a rate plan that fit my needs (at a reasonable price) I&#039;ve found in ten years of intensive travel that their network doesn&#039;t in fact suck as badly as Verizon would have you believe.

My only complaint about Sprint is the crappy limited selection of phones.  (The Palm Pre being one of them)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the Pre is anything to worry about, Palm lost the battle to RIM some time ago, they&#8217;re barely trying to stay relevant.  Palm is the smart-phone of choice among teenie-boppers and such for some reason, but even that&#8217;s giving way to Blackberry at this point.</p>
<p>As for Sprint, I have to disagree with you on coverage.  I&#8217;ve used sprint for almost 10 years now, and while it started out being because they were the only one to offer a rate plan that fit my needs (at a reasonable price) I&#8217;ve found in ten years of intensive travel that their network doesn&#8217;t in fact suck as badly as Verizon would have you believe.</p>
<p>My only complaint about Sprint is the crappy limited selection of phones.  (The Palm Pre being one of them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
