Apple released its iPad on Saturday. Already CNET.com is declaring that HP’s slate will be an ‘iPad Killer’. I find this funny because iPad hasn’t had time to establish itself, let alone sort out what market it is being sold to and yet, CNET is certain of the powerhouse that iPad will become. So much so, that they feel the need to start bestowing titles upon competing devices as though iPad is already dominating a market that barely even exists.
Admittedly, in the mobile device world, 300,000 units sold on opening day is nothing to spit at, but it hardly compares to the avalanche of iPhones that Apple has sold. You may not know someone that has an iPad. But odds are very good that if you don’t own an iPhone, you know at least one person who does.
Think about that for a minute.
No, I mean it. Really think about the implications of that.
What it means is that Apple has created a product that millions of people worldwide have fallen in love with. AT&Ts less than stellar cellular service does not stop Americans from going out and buying iPhones in droves. People still buy iPhone anyway. They do it because iPhone is good at what it does. It’s a smart phone that’s so easy to use that it belongs in a Geico commercial.
This was a game changer. The minute that iPhone hit the shelves, every smart phone vendor that did not have a touch screen phone was standing there with his proverbial pants pulled down to his ankles revealing tacky boxer shorts that screamed advertisements for a cruise line based out of Aruba.
I believe that one thing we have learned in the nearly 4 years since iPhone’s release is that iPhone isn’t dominating the market because it has a touch screen. If that were the case, then other touch screen phones would be selling equally well and they just plain aren’t.
The important thing about iPhone is that whole Geico effect.
Anyone can do it. Anyone can make an iPhone do cool things. You don’t have to be a programmer to use Shazam or Snaptell. All you have to do is tap.
You do not have to flip and flick through layers and layers of menus to get to the one application you want. It’s RIGHT there! iPhone is all about instant gratification. Coder geeks, the guys who are used to figuring out how stuff works and discovering ways to do new things with the old stuff are not an instant gratification sort of crowd. They are all about customizing and tweaking and adding their own features. With iPad, the option is there if you want it. The SDK is free.
But you have to remember that iPad was not built to wow the technophiles.
It was built to be used by ordinary people who had no idea that a computer could be used to do something other than “google”.
Wilson Rothman made this point beautifully when he posted this article on Gizmodo about taking his iPad to church with him on Easter Sunday. He said, “My mother-in-law may not care a fig for most of what Gizmodo covers, but she does see the iPad as a tool to help her in her work—and in her faith.”
This is exactly right. iPad is a tool.
Not a tool box.
A lot of folks out there who are speaking ill of iPad and its potential are forgetting this very simple thing, much like they did with iPhone. iPad is not meant to replace your PC. It is designed to create a different kind of user experience for you. iPad is a device meant to challenge your ideas about technology and its place in your life.
That, my friends, is innovation.
Well, sort of. In the world of personal computing, Apple still has a small percentage in terms of market share. 10%. And I’m not talking about just the computers, that’s INCLUDING the iPhone. **Source NetMARKETSHARE
Add that to Apples absolutely STUPID refusal to support Flash on ANY of their devices (rendering sites like Hulu.com unusable) and it’s the Betamax all over again.
I love the Apple OS, I think that if there was a version of Snow Leopard that would run on readily available hardware I’d probably jump at it. (I’m an Ubuntu user on my laptop, Windows on my Desktop) however I don’t see that happening, because Apple uses it’s software to guarantee hardware sales.
Which brings us to the biggest problem with the iPad, the iPhone, and Apple in general is vendor lock-in. Most people don’t like it. The biggest complaint about the iPhone/iTouch/iPad, etc I’ve heard is the fact that you can almost not get a single application through anyone but Apple.
As far as the iPad goes, this is the worst kind of vendor lock-in. Yes other vendors can submit applications for the i but it remains to be approved by apple.
And then, once you’ve bought your app, you’re hooked, because you can’t transport those applications to another platform.
Which is exactly where Apple wants you to be. Beholden to them.
The main benefit to the HP Slate, and the Dell versions that are undoubtedly soon-to-be-announced, is this.
If I decide I don’t like my HP, I can take my applications to the next platform. I’ve already paid for them, why shouldn’t I?
Portability and availability are the things that HP and others will offer that Apple can’t, or won’t.
To be honest with you.. I do NOT understand the hype over Hulu. You can’t watch a TV show like that unless you’re some kind of religious television freak who shows up once a week to get the next episode.
If I had time for that… I’d watch the thing on TV. Netflix is how I do it. Truly on demand video playback is what I’m after… and netflix app on iPad just owns.
I have only ever had one problem with software on my Mac. Everything I have ever downloaded from anyone (including Microsoft) works GREAT on my Mac, except for the stuff made by Adobe. Adobe’s coders are sloppy. I’ve only ever seen a crash on my Mac… thanks to Flash.
I hear this Flash argument all the time and I have to wonder what it is that you actually intend to do that requires flash. No one will give me an answer that makes sense. Usually the response I hear is “Stuff”. I don’t even bother to ask “What stuff?” anymore. I did once and never got a response. I’m beginning to suspect that the answer is actually “Farmville.”
That portability that you’re talking about is the ability to take those applications from one Windows tablet to another Windows tablet. Yes, you might be able to switch hardware platforms, but you will not be able to switch software platforms anymore than you can now.
In that sense, the slate is not going to change anything for you. You can’t take applications from windows to mac or from windows to linux. THAT sort of portability does not exist anywhere.
That money is just gone. So don’t try to argue that HP is offering you something that you can get elsewhere because you’re just lying to yourself. You will not be able to port those apps around as you please.
You will only port them around as Microsoft allows.
In terms of availability… availability of what exactly? Of applications? Um… There’s an app for that.
Availability of hardware? That won’t be any different than iPad.
The Slate will be a closed system, same as iPad. The batteries are not user replaceable. The only thing it does have that iPad does not… a memory stick slot (along with a lower screen res and half the battery life and a higher price tag for the base model).
I don’t think you’re going to get anything with it that you couldn’t get with iPad. In fact, I think you’ll be paying more for less.